According to @ai_9684xtpa, the verified capital invested in WLFI is 15M rather than 7M, correcting earlier figures and providing more accurate context for position sizing and market depth assessments (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). According to @ai_9684xtpa, a list of the top 10 individual WLFI holders and their cost basis has been shared for review, enabling traders to track whale concentration and reference cost levels in on-chain analysis (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, four wallets deposited 10 million USDC into Hyperliquid this morning to build long $XPL exposure (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the addresses reported are 0x302...E4fC5 funded by 0xe41...858c7, and 0x72E...e6483, 0x6c7...86778, 0xAe8...8aC35 all funded by 0x006...2a78f (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, these flows are linked to the Aug 27 hedging/sniping liquidation coordination and the source alleges ongoing XPL manipulation, which traders should treat as an alert to concentrated positioning risk on Hyperliquid’s XPL perps (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders should monitor XPL funding rates, open interest, order‑book depth, and liquidation maps on Hyperliquid for signs of large long positioning impacting volatility and squeezes, given the reported deposits (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x42B...6bbf6 accumulated 210,000 LINK on Aug 17 at an average price of $23.94 (about $5.06M) and is currently showing an unrealized profit of $303,000; source: @ai_9684xtpa. Wallet 0xCEd...837b9 purchased 276,000 LINK on-chain on Aug 17 at an average of $22.12 (about $6.63M) and is showing an unrealized profit of $900,000; source: @ai_9684xtpa. A third wallet 0x61b...00EC3 was also cited as buying on Aug 17, but full position details were not included in the excerpt; source: @ai_9684xtpa. These figures indicate notable whale accumulation in mid-August at average entry prices near $22–24; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, four related wallet addresses participated in an XPL snipe and realized a cumulative profit of 46.1 million dollars, with detailed transactions and addresses shared in the post at https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1960531751337640214 (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders can review the cited wallets and transaction history to monitor potential flows that could impact XPL liquidity and volatility if trading this asset (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, four primary wallets executed a hedged long-led short squeeze in XPL, realizing an estimated $46.1 million in profit, based on on-chain trade tracking (source: @ai_9684xtpa, X, Aug 27, 2025). The lead wallet 0xb9c...6801e accumulated long positions in multiple small tranches starting Aug 24 and then executed a large buy at 05:35 that blew out short positions, indicating a coordinated squeeze trigger (source: @ai_9684xtpa, X, Aug 27, 2025). Three additional participating wallets—0xe41...858c7, 0x006...2a78f, and 0x894...00779—were identified as part of the operation, reinforcing concentrated order flow behind the move (source: @ai_9684xtpa, X, Aug 27, 2025).

According to Lookonchain, three whale wallets aggressively longed XPL, drove the price to 1.8 dollars, wiped out others' positions, and captured nearly 38 million dollars in profits in under an hour, source: Lookonchain, Aug 27, 2025. For traders, the whale-driven spike underscores concentrated flow risk and the potential for rapid liquidation cascades in XPL markets, source: Lookonchain, Aug 27, 2025. Risk management should prioritize reduced leverage, strict stops, and liquidity checks when trading XPL following such whale activity, source: Lookonchain, Aug 27, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, whales are buying as a newly created wallet 0x2607 withdrew 11,950 ETH worth about $51.32M from Binance, with the address and transfer visible on Arkham Intelligence’s explorer at intel.arkm.com; source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence. Another newly created address bc1qcn withdrew 1,046 BTC worth about $118.27M from Binance roughly 20 minutes earlier, with transaction details likewise shown on Arkham Intelligence; source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence. These outflows remove 11,950 ETH and 1,046 BTC from Binance’s exchange balances until any re-deposit occurs, reducing exchange-held supply by those amounts; source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence. Traders can monitor these two addresses for re-deposits or movements to other venues to assess short-term flow risk and liquidity changes; source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH continued to move lower as two addresses just reduced 5,634.08 ETH with a realized loss of USD 0.83 million; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 19, 2025. The total forced reductions today reached 11,585.13 ETH, signaling intensified deleveraging pressure; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 19, 2025. The latest liquidation price on the reported positions is USD 4,159, highlighting elevated liquidation risk near that level; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 19, 2025. Traders should closely monitor ETH spot and perp liquidity around USD 4,159 and manage leverage given the reported forced deleveraging; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 19, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, two institution-linked wallets (0x50A5 and 0x9bdB) received 9,044 ETH (about $38 million) from FalconX roughly 25 minutes before the post during a market downturn (source: @lookonchain). @lookonchain characterizes this transfer as continued institutional buying of ETH, highlighting on-chain inflows to institution-linked addresses via FalconX (source: @lookonchain).

According to Lookonchain, two newly created wallets withdrew 25,684 ETH valued at about $114.3 million from FalconX roughly four hours before the post, marking a significant on-chain transfer event for ETH. Source: Lookonchain on X, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957240911177646448 According to Lookonchain, the post includes two direct links to the involved wallet addresses, enabling market participants to monitor follow-on movements of these funds. Source: Lookonchain on X, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957240911177646448 According to Lookonchain, the reported figures imply an average transfer value near $4,450 per ETH based on the stated USD amount. Source: Lookonchain on X, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957240911177646448 According to Lookonchain, no additional context on intent or subsequent exchange deposits was provided in the post, so the event is currently limited to a confirmed large withdrawal from FalconX to two new wallets. Source: Lookonchain on X, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957240911177646448

According to @lookonchain, another newly created wallet withdrew 17,591 ETH (about $81.62M) from Kraken in the past 2 hours, based on on-chain tracking shared on X; source: Lookonchain on X. Over the past three days, two newly created wallets have cumulatively withdrawn 71,025 ETH (about $330M) from Kraken, as reported by Lookonchain with transaction references; source: Lookonchain on X. The addresses and transactions are viewable via the Arkham Intelligence explorer link referenced by Lookonchain, indicating outflows from Kraken-labeled wallets to fresh addresses; source: Arkham Intelligence explorer via link shared by Lookonchain. These net withdrawals reflect ETH moving off a centralized exchange into newly created self-custody addresses at the time of reporting; source: Lookonchain on X and Arkham Intelligence explorer.

According to @GracyBitget, Bitcoin (BTC) volatility is currently near historic lows, levels last seen ahead of the 2023 price rally. Key trading signals include significant accumulation by whale wallets, a developing RSI divergence, and an uptick in the altseason Index. These indicators suggest growing momentum beneath the surface, with a decisive breakout above the $122,000 level identified as a potential trigger for the next upward move in the Bitcoin market. Traders are advised to monitor these metrics closely for actionable signals. Source: @GracyBitget

According to @lookonchain, large investors continue to accumulate ETH, with a fresh wallet (0x3dF3) receiving 12,000 ETH (approximately $45 million) from the Galaxy Digital OTC wallet within the last 8 hours. Since July 9, a total of nine new wallets have acquired 640,646 ETH, totaling around $2.43 billion. This ongoing whale accumulation indicates significant institutional interest and could signal bullish momentum for ETH trading in the near term, as reported by the source.

According to Santiment, on-chain data from the past week shows a significant divergence in whale activity between Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH). The number of wallets holding 10,000 or more ETH has increased by 45, a 4.0% rise, coinciding with a 25% price surge for the asset. This suggests strong accumulation from large holders. Conversely, wallets holding 1,000 or more BTC have decreased by 39, a 1.8% drop, as Bitcoin's price fell by 3%. This indicates potential profit-taking or distribution among Bitcoin whales, presenting a bearish signal for BTC in contrast to the bullish momentum for ETH.

According to Santiment (@santimentfeed), traders can now monitor real-time changes in whale and shark wallet levels using their updated chart tool. This data provides actionable insights into large holder movements, which often precede significant volatility in major cryptocurrencies like BTC and ETH. Savvy traders are leveraging these wallet fluctuation patterns to anticipate price swings and adjust their strategies accordingly (source: @santimentfeed, June 16, 2025).

According to Lookonchain, six major whale wallets executed a significant sale of 5.23 million ZKJ tokens, netting $9.66 million (source: Lookonchain, June 15, 2025). The involved wallets include 0x6aD390b069316ca0877a039AccDC5e02beDe2EBb and 0x0781325b3688714065b15C8d9fC0d4827628bdE7, among others. This substantial offload may increase selling pressure on $ZKJ in the short term and signals potential bearish sentiment from large holders. Traders should closely watch ZKJ price action and order book liquidity for volatility following this whale movement.

According to Bubblemaps, a comparative analysis of blockchain bubble maps before and after a recent crypto pump reveals significant shifts in large holder (whale) wallet activity. The before map shows a dispersed distribution of holdings, while post-pump data indicates consolidation among key wallets, suggesting coordinated accumulation or profit-taking by major players (source: Bubblemaps Twitter, June 11, 2025). For traders, these visualizations highlight the importance of monitoring whale movements to anticipate potential price volatility and trend reversals in the cryptocurrency market.

According to Lookonchain, several significant Ethereum wallets, including 0xe9c8C070C5e690A98d8D3814B886ee47e3DFfE89 and 0xA8f6B7D0938D90d4A7389382f475afe3C49D5243, have shown notable on-chain activity, indicating potential large-scale asset shifts. Traders should monitor these whale wallet transactions closely, as such movements often precede volatility in major cryptocurrencies like ETH. Whale activity can signal potential price swings, liquidity changes, and market sentiment shifts, providing actionable insights for both short-term and long-term trading strategies. Source: Lookonchain (May 20, 2025).

According to Bubblemaps, the latest bubble map visualization provides traders with detailed insights into token distribution and wallet clustering on-chain, highlighting potential whale concentrations and liquidity risks (source: Bubblemaps Twitter, May 16, 2025). This transparency enables market participants to better assess the risk of sudden price movements, aiding in more informed trading decisions for high-volume tokens and trending crypto assets.

According to Lookonchain, significant whale accumulation of SUNDOG is underway, as two newly created wallets (TGApPw and TDWWJ) withdrew a combined 40.3 million SUNDOG tokens, valued at $2.09 million, from Bybit just four hours ago (source: Lookonchain on Twitter, May 8, 2025). Additionally, wallets TUbMd and TF4YHc—potentially belonging to the same whale—have withdrawn 28.74 million SUNDOG ($1.47 million) from the exchange. These large-scale outflows from Bybit suggest growing confidence among major holders, which typically signals potential upward price movement and increased interest for traders monitoring SUNDOG's on-chain activity (source: tronscan.org). Such actions may also attract attention in broader crypto market circles, influencing sentiment and liquidity trends.