According to @lookonchain, Strategy holds 649,870 BTC bought at a $74,433 average, now showing $6.15B (+12.72%) in unrealized profit on a $54.52B position (source: @lookonchain). Bitmine holds 3,559,879 ETH bought near a $4,010 average, now at an unrealized loss of $4.52B (-31.67%) on a $9.75B position (source: @lookonchain). Forward Industries holds 6,834,506 SOL bought at a $232.08 average, now at an unrealized loss of $711M (-44.85%) on an $874.8M position (source: @lookonchain). Across these reported wallets, BTC is the only position in profit while ETH and SOL are in significant unrealized losses, highlighting relative BTC strength versus ETH and SOL during the latest market drop for this cohort (source: @lookonchain).

According to @lookonchain, two newly created wallets withdrew 70,000 SOL (about $9.8M) from Binance, marking a notable exchange outflow for SOL on Nov 19, 2025. Source: Lookonchain on X. According to @lookonchain, the destination addresses are CtLRP5UZG51w9kkLZWPPP4XeCrofPkKPRKPqNintm1wp and 8URGHT5ycKtW9Ni55Ce83aguQwuqfdg4J7ppZAvMee69, referenced via Arkham Intel explorer links at intel.arkm.com. Source: Lookonchain on X and Arkham Intel links shared in the post.

According to @lookonchain, trader 7ZsN8P initially bought 20.67M $67 for $7,400, then sold for $3,040 to realize a $4,360 loss (-59%), source: Lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, he later used three wallets to purchase another 36.56M $67 for $14,250 and provided liquidity to earn trading fees, source: Lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, after $67 rallied, he removed all liquidity and now holds 37.43M $67 valued around $1.44M, source: Lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, his unrealized profit on $67 is about $1.43M, equating to roughly a 100x return on the later capital deployed, source: Lookonchain. Wallet traces were shared by @lookonchain and can be verified on Solscan via the listed addresses, source: Lookonchain and Solscan.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, a WLFI multisig transferred 166.6M WLFI (about USD 23.74M) to seven wallets, with roughly 23.8M WLFI sent to each wallet, source: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1989184522752311625. The sender address is 0x33CCF78A2091979fbC5A7631e6c71e900715AB78, viewable on Arkham Intel for verification, source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x33CCF78A2091979fbC5A7631e6c71e900715AB78. The post also states that all WLFI held by early buyers remain locked, indicating these transfers are not from retail unlocks, source: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1989184522752311625. For trading relevance, this concentrated distribution across seven wallets represents a sizable supply movement that warrants monitoring for subsequent exchange inflows and liquidity shifts, source: https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1989184522752311625 and https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x33CCF78A2091979fbC5A7631e6c71e900715AB78.

According to @OnchainLens, newly created wallets are accumulating Chainlink (LINK) as of Nov 11, 2025: wallet 0x618b8b78CaEe5D613A18F108C024eCc5eD421Adc withdrew 62,636 LINK (about 1.0M USD) from Binance and has amassed 179,393 LINK (about 2.88M USD) over the past three days (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). Additionally, wallet 0xd11c416e848E6E1141984a5Bb3712558D4D18B19 withdrew 145,250 LINK (about 2.33M USD) roughly one hour prior to the report (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen). In total, the two new wallets have accumulated 324,643 LINK (about 5.21M USD) within three days, reflecting continued exchange outflows from Binance to self-custody addresses (source: @OnchainLens; data: Nansen).

According to Crypto Rover, OG Bitcoin whales are moving BTC this year at an unprecedented pace, as stated in an X post dated Nov 8, 2025 (source: Crypto Rover on X, Nov 8, 2025). The post does not include wallet addresses, transaction volumes, or exchange inflow and outflow data to verify the claim (source: Crypto Rover on X, Nov 8, 2025). The post also provides no price levels, timelines, or specific trading signals for execution (source: Crypto Rover on X, Nov 8, 2025).

According to Lookonchain, two newly created Solana wallets accumulated 6.48 million BULLISH over the past four days with a total spend of about $101,000 based on on-chain tracking by Lookonchain. Solscan data for addresses 8YBgxgjuerVFG8FEi1SYYgikaqHZS68pgYf2jo6kdL9P and 2yJ4dHfMqxdxuwWc18o7KEswpUSu7Dp7hxHooq1YmAke confirm recent BULLISH purchases and that the wallets are newly created on Solana, according to Solscan. The totals imply an average acquisition price near $0.0156 per BULLISH calculated from the figures $101,000 and 6.48 million tokens reported by Lookonchain.

According to @lookonchain, both machismallbrother.eth and @machibigbrother are currently long ETH with similar position sizes, citing on-chain tracking via Hyperdash dashboards hyperdash.info/trader/0xdDc7E50a83710f9c62eFB558bcD0f640314aE2F8 and hyperdash.info/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 and the report on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439. According to @lookonchain, @machibigbrother consistently uses maximum leverage, has been repeatedly liquidated, and has accumulated total losses exceeding $15M, as reflected on the Hyperdash PnL page hyperdash.info/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872 and the X post twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439. According to @lookonchain, machismallbrother.eth employs moderate leverage and is currently up about $8.5M, corroborated by Hyperdash PnL data hyperdash.info/trader/0xdDc7E50a83710f9c62eFB558bcD0f640314aE2F8 and the X post twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439. According to @lookonchain, the explicit takeaway for traders is to avoid high-leverage gambling trades, based on the observed outcomes in these ETH long positions twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439. According to @lookonchain’s figures ($15M+ loss vs $8.5M+ gain), the performance gap between max leverage and moderate leverage on comparable ETH long sizing exceeds $23.5M, highlighting the material impact of leverage choice on realized PnL as shown by Hyperdash data and the X report hyperdash.info and twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1986479868754993439.

According to @lookonchain, multiple whale wallets collectively bought 394,682 ETH in the past 3 days, totaling approximately $1.37 billion (source: @lookonchain, X, Nov 6, 2025). According to @lookonchain, the purchases were made by many large addresses over the stated 3-day window (source: @lookonchain). Based on figures reported by @lookonchain, the implied average acquisition price is roughly $3,472 per ETH, calculated from $1.37B divided by 394,682 (source: @lookonchain).

According to the source, SpaceX-linked wallets moved additional Bitcoin (BTC) from an estimated $894 million treasury position. Source: the source post. The activity was visible on the Bitcoin blockchain as sizeable outbound transfers to new addresses, which by itself does not confirm any BTC sales. Source: public Bitcoin blockchain data. Traders are monitoring BTC exchange net inflows, futures basis, and funding rates to gauge potential near-term sell-side pressure if coins migrate toward exchanges. Source: Binance public exchange flow metrics; CME Group BTC futures data.

According to @lookonchain, eight top traders on Hyperliquid are highlighted in a bulls vs bears showdown with their wallet profiles shared for public tracking. Source: @lookonchain on X, Oct 28, 2025. The post provides nine Hyperdash trader links for real-time monitoring of these accounts’ activity: https://hyperdash.info/trader/0x020ca66c30bec2c4fe3861a94e4db4a498a35872, https://hyperdash.info/trader/0x4e8d91cB10b32CA351Ac8f1962F33514a96797F4, https://hyperdash.info/trader/0x5078C2fBeA2b2aD61bc840Bc023E35Fce56BeDb6, https://hyperdash.info/trader/0xc2a30212a8DdAc9e123944d6e29FADdCe994E5f2, https://hyperdash.info/trader/0x218A65E21EDDeeCE7A9Df38C6bBdd89F692B7Da2, https://hyperdash.info/trader/0xf625aAbf0C9f527697Ff2D99B30dd794cfD76b93, https://hyperdash.info/trader/0xdDc7E50a83710f9c62eFB558bcD0f640314aE2F8, https://hyperdash.info/trader/0xb9feE4502dE61504E5e6E69faa74Df7f0Ed6d365, https://hyperdash.info/trader/0x5D2F4460Ac3514AdA79f5D9838916E508Ab39Bb7. Source: Hyperdash trader pages linked in the post. Traders can use these Hyperdash profiles to observe each account’s positioning and performance in real time to inform long-or-short bias assessment. Source: Hyperdash trader pages linked above.

According to Onchain Lens, three newly created wallets received 72,898 ETH valued at about $279.45M from FalconX and BitGo on Oct 17, 2025, with recipient addresses 0xd4Ced86B2ED7581C72f9a0643DD103a9e77C404A, 0xf093B03312Ff828C3D8687F6ced8765478ae3b32, and 0x7930325731FDb5c6e56daC8E26C9245D726eaD11, source: Onchain Lens. Onchain Lens indicated these wallets likely belong to Bitmine, which remains unconfirmed, source: Onchain Lens. No exchange deposit addresses were cited in the alert, suggesting only inbound transfers to new wallets were reported, source: Onchain Lens. Based on the reported totals, the implied average value is roughly 3,833 dollars per ETH, which traders can use as a reference cost basis for monitoring subsequent flows, source: Onchain Lens. Traders can track these wallet addresses for any outbound transfers to known exchange deposit wallets as potential short term sell pressure signals, using the addresses reported by Onchain Lens as monitoring anchors, source: Onchain Lens.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, two wallets that went long before the market dump posted large realized losses tracked via HyperBot on-chain dashboards. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Oct 12, 2025 (x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1977194060759941378). Address 0x0dd...8a902 realized a $2.37M loss on SOL longs and a $3.19M loss on ETH longs, then later recouped $363K via subsequent trades. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Oct 12, 2025; hyperbot.network/trader/0x0ddf9bae2af4b874b96d287a5ad42eb47138a902. Address 0x8d0...59244 realized a $3.586M loss on SOL longs and a $32K loss on SUI longs. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Oct 12, 2025; hyperbot.network/trader/0x8d0e342e0524392d035fb37461c6f5813ff59244. The author notes both accounts have capital over $10M, indicating portfolio impact was contained despite the drawdown. Source: X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Oct 12, 2025 (x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1977194060759941378). Netting the $363K recovery, combined losses across the two addresses total approximately $8.815M. Source: Calculation based on figures in the X post by @ai_9684xtpa on Oct 12, 2025.

According to @bobbyong, he questioned a circulating claim that only about 450 crypto participants are worth more than $10 million, referencing a post by @mdudas on X. source: @bobbyong on X, Oct 9, 2025; @mdudas on X. If accurate, such a small cohort would imply high wealth concentration that heightens whale-driven price impact and liquidity fragility, a dynamic documented in Bitcoin ownership research showing substantial concentration among top holders. source: Makarov and Schoar, NBER Working Paper 29396, 2021. For traders, this concentration argues for tighter slippage controls, attention to large on-chain transfers and order-book depth around catalysts, as outsized flows from large holders can amplify volatility. source: Makarov and Schoar, NBER Working Paper 29396, 2021; @bobbyong on X, Oct 9, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, three top traders in the BNB meme season are @hexiecs, @brc20niubi, and @GCsheng (source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 8, 2025). @hexiecs realized $5.5M on $币安人生, $361.7K on $4, and $219.5K on $GIGGLE (source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 8, 2025). @brc20niubi realized $5.4M on $币安人生, $736K on $4, and $228.3K on $GIGGLE (source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 8, 2025). @GCsheng realized $4.8M on $币安人生 and $26.8K on $客服小何 (source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 8, 2025). For tracking and trade monitoring, the reported wallet addresses are 0xeb89055e16ae1c1e42ad6770a7344ff5c7b4f31d, 0x176e6378b7c9010f0456bee76ce3039d36dc37c8, and 0x51fbb0b8164231c116acdce55db3d5c0d9650987, tied to activity in BNB Chain memecoins including $GIGGLE, $4, $币安人生, and $客服小何 (source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 8, 2025).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, PALU surged 20x following its Alpha launch, signaling aggressive momentum driven by concentrated buying interest, source: @ai_9684xtpa (X, Oct 7, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, 12 addresses cumulatively bought $2.981M after the announcement, which the author states helped accelerate the price move; wallets cited include 0x7b9d26a6a29dcfac53b88b7530f424d25db10284, 0x79f15b7b6e0497021e9c484cbe46df5c21b18ff7, and 0xaf467808f1117c0c1189b91023b2265857b258ce, among others, source: @ai_9684xtpa (X, Oct 7, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, in tandem, Binance Life’s value briefly fell back to $53M after previously touching $80M, indicating a short-term shift in flows per the author’s on-chain tracking, source: @ai_9684xtpa (X, Oct 7, 2025).

According to @lookonchain, two whale wallets 6AkVuG and D6FN73 accumulated 622.49 million PUMP on Solana for approximately $3.48 million about 13 hours before publication, with the transactions visible on Solscan at the referenced addresses. Sources: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1973038700482421155 https://solscan.io/account/D6FN73mc9fNdCnotefrVPnip54WzUgxjBLHLKaEhBNtd https://solscan.io/account/6AkVuGtTXeumyWUE3zrRuG7XmwV5PfaJNNUAQzVUFSSx Based on those figures, the buys imply an average executed cost near $0.0056 per PUMP, derived from $3.48M divided by 622.49M. Source: https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1973038700482421155 Traders can monitor these two Solana addresses on Solscan for subsequent inflows or outflows that may indicate distribution or further accumulation in PUMP markets. Sources: https://solscan.io/account/D6FN73mc9fNdCnotefrVPnip54WzUgxjBLHLKaEhBNtd https://solscan.io/account/6AkVuGtTXeumyWUE3zrRuG7XmwV5PfaJNNUAQzVUFSSx

According to @OnchainLens, a dormant Bitcoin whale transferred 400.07 BTC after 11.9 years, splitting approximately $44.24 million across 27 wallets (source: Onchain Lens on X; source: bitinfocharts link provided by Onchain Lens for block 916840). @OnchainLens reports the coins were acquired in 2013 for $239,866, implying an entry price near $600 per BTC and a notional return of roughly 184x at the cited valuation, if marked to market (source: Onchain Lens; calculation based on figures cited). The addresses are described as Satoshi-era wallets by @OnchainLens (source: Onchain Lens). The cited sources show intra-wallet distribution and do not indicate any exchange deposits at this time (source: Onchain Lens post and the referenced bitinfocharts page).

According to @adriannewman21, the reported bug in PNKSTR is being presented as a feature, shifting the narrative around $PNKSTR for traders. Source: Adrian (@adriannewman21) on X, Sep 28, 2025. He adds that whale wallets dumped today and calls for $PNKSTR to run it back to 100m, signaling his bullish stance despite the sell-off. Source: Adrian (@adriannewman21) on X, Sep 28, 2025.

According to @OnchainLens, two newly created wallets withdrew 42,089 ETH valued at approximately USD 169.37 million from Kraken and OKX, with the withdrawal addresses identified as 0x1170025E2AA1120D7359638D76224e92A3bC08c4 and 0x069FEaEd2171aaB9BCdc51b7AEFf13863698f40C, source: @OnchainLens citing Nansen data. Per Nansen data cited by @OnchainLens, these transfers are categorized as exchange-to-external withdrawals to newly created addresses, indicating on-chain outflows rather than internal exchange movements, source: Nansen via @OnchainLens. Glassnode defines exchange outflows as coins leaving exchange-labeled wallets, which mechanically reduces measured exchange balances and available sell-side inventory on exchanges, source: Glassnode Academy. Kaiko Research reports that large exchange outflows can coincide with thinner spot order book depth and elevated slippage risk, which traders monitor alongside netflow and liquidity metrics, source: Kaiko Research. Traders can track ETH exchange netflows, aggregate exchange balances, and whale wallet activity to gauge near-term liquidity conditions following these withdrawals, source: Glassnode metrics documentation and Nansen on-chain labels.