According to @EmberCN, two wallets that received WLFI from the WLFI strategic reserve wallet 0xA71 on listing day transferred 64.43 million WLFI (~$14.19 million) into Binance today, indicating fresh centralized exchange inflows for WLFI, source: @EmberCN on X; Arkham Intelligence. The WLFI strategic reserve distributed 2 billion WLFI to 56 wallets on Sep 1, with 35.714 million WLFI per wallet, source: @EmberCN on X; Arkham Intelligence. Of those 56 wallets, 26 were exchange deposit addresses that sent their WLFI to exchanges on the same day, while the remaining 30 on-chain wallets held for roughly 20 days before first moving today, source: @EmberCN on X. The two moving wallets identified are 0xd45C867b7e1471c7d55AEbdC7a784892d237a53D and 0xb6B536E27c5c5C872874b03F278ddae5EBFe04e1, and reserve-linked on-chain wallets still hold about 1 billion WLFI (~$220 million), source: @EmberCN on X; Arkham Intelligence. Traders often monitor such exchange inflows as a short-term supply indicator that can impact order books and liquidity for WLFI on Binance, source: Binance Research; CryptoQuant Analytics.

According to the source, on-chain data compiled by Lookonchain shows six entities each hold more than 1 million SOL, highlighting concentrated SOL supply among top holders, source: Lookonchain. Forward Industries is identified as the largest holder with 6.82 million SOL, marking the biggest single reported position among the six entities, source: Lookonchain.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, five newly created wallets withdrew a combined 60,499 ETH, equivalent to about 264.31 million dollars, from Kraken roughly 12 hours before the post, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X dated Sep 11, 2025. The same source reported that about 30 minutes before the post, a wallet labeled SharpLinkGaming transferred 319.43 million USDC to a Galaxy Digital labeled address, source: @OnchainDataNerd on X and Arkham Intelligence address 0x9E07015c083da6384A174934b970b783415a6586 at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x9E07015c083da6384A174934b970b783415a6586. For ETH traders, large exchange withdrawals and sizable stablecoin transfers to institutional desks are commonly monitored as liquidity signals that can affect near term market depth and execution costs, source: Kaiko Research on order book liquidity and CryptoQuant Exchange Reserves metric documentation. To validate persistence of these flows, traders can track ETH exchange balances and subsequent movements of the receiving address in real time, source: CryptoQuant exchange reserve dashboards and Arkham Intelligence address explorer.

According to @lookonchain, four newly created wallets withdrew 78,229 ETH (about $342 million) from Kraken over the past 10 hours, highlighting large, concentrated outflows from the exchange (source: @lookonchain on X, Sep 11, 2025). @lookonchain characterized these transfers as institutional buying and provided Arkham Intelligence explorer links for the specific wallet addresses involved for verification (source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence). This activity indicates a net outflow of 78,229 ETH from Kraken during the cited window, with the addresses flagged as new entities by @lookonchain (source: @lookonchain).

According to @OnchainLens (X, Sep 8, 2025), two wallets likely linked to one entity withdrew 20,000 ETH, valued at roughly 86 million dollars, from Coinbase Prime. According to @OnchainLens citing Nansen data, the withdrawn ETH was subsequently staked through EtherFi. The involved addresses are 0x12A9FdaD296e707989376fF113bD2D6Cd5173277 and 0x688Ec3b96bf4535B364Cb37a4Bf416e266d7113d, per Nansen labels reported by @OnchainLens. Nansen provides exchange net flows and protocol inflow dashboards that can be used to track ETH liquidity effects from such outflows and staking deposits, as referenced by @OnchainLens.

According to @OnchainDataNerd, Arkham-labeled wallets saw large 24-hour ETH movements: BlackRock deposited 33,884 ETH (~$148.64M), Bitmine withdrew 38,709 ETH (~$167.22M), and three fresh wallets withdrew 22,397 ETH (~$96.69M) source: X post https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1963820825104322916; Arkham Intelligence entity and address pages https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/blackrock, https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/entity/bitmine, https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x1157A2076b9bB22a85CC2C162f20fAB3898F4101. This implies a net outflow of 27,222 ETH (~$115.27M) over the period, calculated from the reported figures, which traders track for potential liquidity shifts across labeled entities source: calculation based on @OnchainDataNerd figures on X https://twitter.com/OnchainDataNerd/status/1963820825104322916 and the referenced Arkham Intelligence pages.

According to Lookonchain, wallet 0xb2c7 received 14,000 MKR valued at approximately USD 24.25M from FalconX about six hours before the post, source: Lookonchain on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1963795849512931839; Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xb2c70FB9e2297Eff3A98c4Bdf1a81A3D005B843b. According to Lookonchain, wallet 0xc230 accumulated 8,753 MKR valued at approximately USD 15.37M from FalconX over the past two months, source: Lookonchain on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1963795849512931839; Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0xc230f0d9337cbB1BDD2B25288fF60c053F74D649. According to Lookonchain, the combined inflows total 22,753 MKR or roughly USD 39.62M, and the author characterizes these flows as institutional accumulation routed via FalconX, source: Lookonchain on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1963795849512931839.

According to @EmberCN, after ETH rose from $4,350 to $4,480, 34,000 ETH (about $150M) was withdrawn from Binance at around 01:00 into two newly created wallets, with the wallet addresses shared in the post; source: @EmberCN on X, 2025-09-04. The post highlights the timing overlap but provides no evidence that the withdrawals caused the price move; source: @EmberCN on X, 2025-09-04. For trading purposes, the flagged withdrawal size and timing can guide monitoring of subsequent flows from those wallets and Binance to assess potential market impact, as no further context was given in the post; source: @EmberCN on X, 2025-09-04.

According to @lookonchain, presale address 0xC3e7 claimed 60M WLFI valued at $19.2M and deposited the tokens to Binance (source: @lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, address 0x7ed4 claimed 53.33M WLFI valued at $17.1M and also deposited to Binance, while address 0x3881 claimed 46.67M WLFI valued at $14.9M, totaling 160M WLFI worth $51.2M claimed across the three wallets (source: @lookonchain).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, the verified capital invested in WLFI is 15M rather than 7M, correcting earlier figures and providing more accurate context for position sizing and market depth assessments (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). According to @ai_9684xtpa, a list of the top 10 individual WLFI holders and their cost basis has been shared for review, enabling traders to track whale concentration and reference cost levels in on-chain analysis (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, four wallets deposited 10 million USDC into Hyperliquid this morning to build long $XPL exposure (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the addresses reported are 0x302...E4fC5 funded by 0xe41...858c7, and 0x72E...e6483, 0x6c7...86778, 0xAe8...8aC35 all funded by 0x006...2a78f (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, these flows are linked to the Aug 27 hedging/sniping liquidation coordination and the source alleges ongoing XPL manipulation, which traders should treat as an alert to concentrated positioning risk on Hyperliquid’s XPL perps (source: @ai_9684xtpa). According to @ai_9684xtpa, traders should monitor XPL funding rates, open interest, order‑book depth, and liquidation maps on Hyperliquid for signs of large long positioning impacting volatility and squeezes, given the reported deposits (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x42B...6bbf6 accumulated 210,000 LINK on Aug 17 at an average price of $23.94 (about $5.06M) and is currently showing an unrealized profit of $303,000; source: @ai_9684xtpa. Wallet 0xCEd...837b9 purchased 276,000 LINK on-chain on Aug 17 at an average of $22.12 (about $6.63M) and is showing an unrealized profit of $900,000; source: @ai_9684xtpa. A third wallet 0x61b...00EC3 was also cited as buying on Aug 17, but full position details were not included in the excerpt; source: @ai_9684xtpa. These figures indicate notable whale accumulation in mid-August at average entry prices near $22–24; source: @ai_9684xtpa.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, four related wallet addresses participated in an XPL snipe and realized a cumulative profit of 46.1 million dollars, with detailed transactions and addresses shared in the post at https://twitter.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1960531751337640214 (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders can review the cited wallets and transaction history to monitor potential flows that could impact XPL liquidity and volatility if trading this asset (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, four primary wallets executed a hedged long-led short squeeze in XPL, realizing an estimated $46.1 million in profit, based on on-chain trade tracking (source: @ai_9684xtpa, X, Aug 27, 2025). The lead wallet 0xb9c...6801e accumulated long positions in multiple small tranches starting Aug 24 and then executed a large buy at 05:35 that blew out short positions, indicating a coordinated squeeze trigger (source: @ai_9684xtpa, X, Aug 27, 2025). Three additional participating wallets—0xe41...858c7, 0x006...2a78f, and 0x894...00779—were identified as part of the operation, reinforcing concentrated order flow behind the move (source: @ai_9684xtpa, X, Aug 27, 2025).

According to Lookonchain, three whale wallets aggressively longed XPL, drove the price to 1.8 dollars, wiped out others' positions, and captured nearly 38 million dollars in profits in under an hour, source: Lookonchain, Aug 27, 2025. For traders, the whale-driven spike underscores concentrated flow risk and the potential for rapid liquidation cascades in XPL markets, source: Lookonchain, Aug 27, 2025. Risk management should prioritize reduced leverage, strict stops, and liquidity checks when trading XPL following such whale activity, source: Lookonchain, Aug 27, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, whales are buying as a newly created wallet 0x2607 withdrew 11,950 ETH worth about $51.32M from Binance, with the address and transfer visible on Arkham Intelligence’s explorer at intel.arkm.com; source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence. Another newly created address bc1qcn withdrew 1,046 BTC worth about $118.27M from Binance roughly 20 minutes earlier, with transaction details likewise shown on Arkham Intelligence; source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence. These outflows remove 11,950 ETH and 1,046 BTC from Binance’s exchange balances until any re-deposit occurs, reducing exchange-held supply by those amounts; source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence. Traders can monitor these two addresses for re-deposits or movements to other venues to assess short-term flow risk and liquidity changes; source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intelligence.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, ETH continued to move lower as two addresses just reduced 5,634.08 ETH with a realized loss of USD 0.83 million; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 19, 2025. The total forced reductions today reached 11,585.13 ETH, signaling intensified deleveraging pressure; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 19, 2025. The latest liquidation price on the reported positions is USD 4,159, highlighting elevated liquidation risk near that level; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 19, 2025. Traders should closely monitor ETH spot and perp liquidity around USD 4,159 and manage leverage given the reported forced deleveraging; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Aug 19, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, two institution-linked wallets (0x50A5 and 0x9bdB) received 9,044 ETH (about $38 million) from FalconX roughly 25 minutes before the post during a market downturn (source: @lookonchain). @lookonchain characterizes this transfer as continued institutional buying of ETH, highlighting on-chain inflows to institution-linked addresses via FalconX (source: @lookonchain).

According to Lookonchain, two newly created wallets withdrew 25,684 ETH valued at about $114.3 million from FalconX roughly four hours before the post, marking a significant on-chain transfer event for ETH. Source: Lookonchain on X, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957240911177646448 According to Lookonchain, the post includes two direct links to the involved wallet addresses, enabling market participants to monitor follow-on movements of these funds. Source: Lookonchain on X, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957240911177646448 According to Lookonchain, the reported figures imply an average transfer value near $4,450 per ETH based on the stated USD amount. Source: Lookonchain on X, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957240911177646448 According to Lookonchain, no additional context on intent or subsequent exchange deposits was provided in the post, so the event is currently limited to a confirmed large withdrawal from FalconX to two new wallets. Source: Lookonchain on X, https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1957240911177646448

According to @lookonchain, another newly created wallet withdrew 17,591 ETH (about $81.62M) from Kraken in the past 2 hours, based on on-chain tracking shared on X; source: Lookonchain on X. Over the past three days, two newly created wallets have cumulatively withdrawn 71,025 ETH (about $330M) from Kraken, as reported by Lookonchain with transaction references; source: Lookonchain on X. The addresses and transactions are viewable via the Arkham Intelligence explorer link referenced by Lookonchain, indicating outflows from Kraken-labeled wallets to fresh addresses; source: Arkham Intelligence explorer via link shared by Lookonchain. These net withdrawals reflect ETH moving off a centralized exchange into newly created self-custody addresses at the time of reporting; source: Lookonchain on X and Arkham Intelligence explorer.